IP Litigation

Subscribe to IP Litigation via RSS

Foster v. Pitney Bowes: Disclosure of Trade Secrets in Patent Application Costs Plaintiff His Trade Secrets Claim

By John Marsh on February 18, 2013

Posted in IP Litigation, Patents, Pennsylvania, Trade Secrets

Foster v. Pitney Bowes: Disclosure of Trade Secrets in Patent Application Costs Plaintiff His Trade Secrets Claim…
Continue Reading Foster v. Pitney Bowes: Disclosure of Trade Secrets in Patent Application Costs Plaintiff His Trade Secrets Claim

Thursday Wrap-Up (February 14, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on February 14, 2013

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Economic Espionage Act, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (February 14, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (February 14, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Friday Wrap-Up (February 8, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on February 8, 2013

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Florida, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, International Trade Commission, IP Litigation, Legislation, Mattel v. MGA, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets, Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)

Friday Wrap-Up (February 8, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (February 8, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (January 31, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on January 31, 2013

Posted in China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Mattel v. MGA, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (January 31, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (January 31, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (January 24, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on January 24, 2013

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Injunctions, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (January 24, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (January 24, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (January 17, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on January 17, 2013

Posted in California, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Injunctions, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (January 17, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (January 17, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

The Trade Secret Litigator’s Top 3 Trade Secret and Non-Compete Cases of 2012

By John Marsh on January 9, 2013

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), DuPont v. Kolon, Economic Espionage Act, Injunctions, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Trade Secrets

The Trade Secret Litigator’s Top 3 Trade Secret and Non-Compete Cases of 2012…
Continue Reading The Trade Secret Litigator’s Top 3 Trade Secret and Non-Compete Cases of 2012

Amazon.com v. Powers: How Google Insulated Itself and Its New Director of Cloud Platform Sales from Amazon’s Non-Compete

By John Marsh on January 6, 2013

Posted in Injunctions, IP Litigation, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Amazon.com v. Powers: How Google Insulated Itself and Its New Director of Cloud Platform Sales from Amazon’s Non-Compete…
Continue Reading Amazon.com v. Powers: How Google Insulated Itself and Its New Director of Cloud Platform Sales from Amazon’s Non-Compete

Friday Wrap-Up (January 4, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on January 4, 2013

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Injunctions, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Friday Wrap-Up (January 4, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (January 4, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Friday Wrap-Up (December 28, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on December 28, 2012

Posted in California, Cybersecurity, Injunctions, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Friday Wrap-Up (December 28, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (December 28, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web