Intellectual Property

Subscribe to Intellectual Property via RSS

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 25, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 25, 2012

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Injunctions, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 25, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (October 25, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 18, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 18, 2012

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Here are the noteworthy trade secret, non-compete and cybersecurity stories from the past week, as well one or two that I missed over the past couple of weeks: Noteworthy Trade Secret and Non-Compete Posts and Cases:

A Minnesota federal district court has vacated a $630.4 million judgment that had been leveled against disk drive

…

Friday Wrap-Up (October 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non- Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 12, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Friday Wrap-Up (October 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (October 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non- Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 4, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 4, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Illinois, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 4, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (October 4, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

The Kerfuffle over Yahoo’s General Counsel’s “Leaks Uncool” Memo and The Challenges of Building a Culture of Confidentiality

By John Marsh on October 2, 2012

Posted in Cybersecurity, General, Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets

The Kerfuffle over Yahoo’s General Counsel’s “Leaks Uncool” Memo and The Challenges of Building a Culture of Confidentiality…
Continue Reading The Kerfuffle over Yahoo’s General Counsel’s “Leaks Uncool” Memo and The Challenges of Building a Culture of Confidentiality

Thursday Wrap-Up (September 27, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on September 27, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Solicitation Agreements, Ohio, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (September 27, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (September 27, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Read My Hips: Is the Trade Secret Litigator Waffling on a Key Provision of the Protecting American Trade Secrets and Innovation Act of 2012?

By John Marsh on September 23, 2012

Posted in Economic Espionage Act, Intellectual Property, International, Legislation, Trade Secrets

In July, Senators Herb Kohl (WI), Chris Coons (DE) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) introduced the Protecting American Trade Secrets and Innovation Act of 2012 (PATSIA), to the applause of many in the trade secret community, including yours truly. One of PATSIA’s notable provisions proposed is an ex parte seizure order that would enable a trade …

Thursday Wrap-Up (September 20, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on September 20, 2012

Posted in China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Florida, General, Intellectual Property, International, International Trade Commission, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (September 20, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (September 20, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

American Chemical Society v. Leadscope: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms $26.5 Million Award For Malicious Trade Secret Litigation

By John Marsh on September 18, 2012

Posted in Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Ohio, Trade Secrets

American Chemical Society v. Leadscope: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms $26.5 Million Award For Malicious Trade Secret Litigation…
Continue Reading American Chemical Society v. Leadscope: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms $26.5 Million Award For Malicious Trade Secret Litigation

Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!

By John Marsh on September 14, 2012

Posted in Intellectual Property, Legislation, Patents, Trade Secrets

Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!
Continue Reading Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!

Menu

The Trade Secret Litigator