Patents

Wednesday Wrap-Up (November 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on November 7, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Wednesday Wrap-Up (November 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Wednesday Wrap-Up (November 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (November 1, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on November 1, 2012

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (November 1, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (November 1, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Why Are Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements More Important Than Ever? (Hint: A Little Something Called The America Invents Acts)

By John Marsh on October 27, 2012

Posted in Intellectual Property, Legislation, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Patents, Trade Secrets

Why Are Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements More Important Than Ever? (Hint: A Little Something Called The America Invents Acts)…
Continue Reading Why Are Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements More Important Than Ever? (Hint: A Little Something Called The America Invents Acts)

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 25, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 25, 2012

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Injunctions, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 25, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (October 25, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 4, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 4, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Illinois, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (October 4, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (October 4, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (September 27, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on September 27, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Solicitation Agreements, Ohio, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (September 27, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (September 27, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Not to Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!

By John Marsh on September 14, 2012

Posted in Intellectual Property, Legislation, Patents, Trade Secrets

Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!
Continue Reading Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!

Saturday Wrap-Up (September 1, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

By John Marsh on September 1, 2012

Posted in California, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Intellectual Property, International, International Trade Commission, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Saturday Wrap-Up (September 1, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web…
Continue Reading Saturday Wrap-Up (September 1, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (August 23, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

By John Marsh on August 23, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Copyrights, Cybersecurity, Inevitable Disclosure, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (August 23, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (August 23, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

Apple v. Samsung Update: Judge Koh Issues Her Opinion Protecting Intel, Qualcomm, IBM, Nokia and Microsoft Trade Secrets

By John Marsh on August 14, 2012

Posted in California, IP Litigation, Licensing, Patents, Trade Secrets

Apple v. Samsung Update: Judge Koh Issues Her Opinion Protecting Intel, Qualcomm, IBM and Microsoft Trade Secrets, Among Others…
Continue Reading Apple v. Samsung Update: Judge Koh Issues Her Opinion Protecting Intel, Qualcomm, IBM, Nokia and Microsoft Trade Secrets

Menu

The Trade Secret Litigator