Non-Compete Enforceability

Subscribe to Non-Compete Enforceability via RSS

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 31, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

By John Marsh on May 31, 2012

Posted in California, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Florida, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 31, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (May 31, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

Acordia of Ohio v. Fishel: Ohio Supreme Court Finds Non-Compete Does Not Survive Merger If It Lacks “Successor or Assigns” Language

By John Marsh on May 25, 2012

Posted in IP Litigation, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants

Acordia of Ohio v. Fishel: Ohio Supreme Court Finds Non-Compete Will Not Survive Merger Unless Clearly Drafted To Do So…
Continue Reading Acordia of Ohio v. Fishel: Ohio Supreme Court Finds Non-Compete Does Not Survive Merger If It Lacks “Successor or Assigns” Language

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 24, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

By John Marsh on May 24, 2012

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Intellectual Property, International, International Trade Commission, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 24, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from around the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (May 24, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from Around the Web

Recent Legal Developments in Ohio Non-Compete and Trade Secret Law

By John Marsh on May 21, 2012

Posted in Injunctions, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Recent Legal Developments in Ohio Non-Compete and Trade Secret Law…
Continue Reading Recent Legal Developments in Ohio Non-Compete and Trade Secret Law

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 17, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web

By John Marsh on May 17, 2012

Posted in Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Illinois, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 17, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (May 17, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web

Join Me for “Drafting and Enforcing Covenants Not to Compete in the Present Economy: Noteworthy Legal Developments and Practical Pointers” This Friday at the Ohio State Bar Association

By John Marsh on May 16, 2012

Posted in Inevitable Disclosure, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Join Me for “Drafting and Enforcing Covenants Not to Compete in the Present Economy: Noteworthy Legal Developments and Practical Pointers” This Friday at the Ohio State Bar Association…
Continue Reading Join Me for “Drafting and Enforcing Covenants Not to Compete in the Present Economy: Noteworthy Legal Developments and Practical Pointers” This Friday at the Ohio State Bar Association

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 10, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web

By John Marsh on May 10, 2012

Posted in California, China, Cybersecurity, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 10, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (May 10, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web

Martin Marietta v. Vulcan: Four Valuable Drafting and Litigation Lessons for Trade Secret and Non-Compete Lawyers

By John Marsh on May 9, 2012

Posted in Injunctions, IP Litigation, Licensing, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Martin Marietta v. Vulcan: Four Valuable Drafting and Litigation Lessons for Trade Secret and Non-Compete Lawyers…
Continue Reading Martin Marietta v. Vulcan: Four Valuable Drafting and Litigation Lessons for Trade Secret and Non-Compete Lawyers

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 3, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on May 3, 2012

Posted in California, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (May 3, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (May 3, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secrets, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 26, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Posts from Around the Web

By John Marsh on April 26, 2012

Posted in California, China, Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Illinois, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 26, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Posts from Around the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (April 26, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Posts from Around the Web

Menu

The Trade Secret Litigator