On Friday, Delaware Chancery Judge Leo Strine, Jr. issued a 100+ page opinion finding that gravel material supplier Martin Marietta Materials “thoroughly breached” confidentiality agreements with competitor Vulcan Materials during merger negotiations and as a result, its effort at a hostile takeover bid would be prohibited for the next four months. It appears that Martin
Non-Disclosure Agreements
Thursday Wrap-Up (April 19, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Posts from the Web
Thursday Wrap-Up (April 19, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Posts from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (April 19, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Covenant Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Posts from the Web
Thursday Wrap-Up (April 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web
By John Marsh on
Posted in China, Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Economic Espionage Act, Florida, Illinois, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Restrictive Covenants, Technology Transactions, Trade Secrets, Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)
Thursday Wrap-Up (April 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (April 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web
Allergan, Inc. v. Merz Pharmaceuticals: Central District of California Hammers Merz for Failure to Timely Produce Documents and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Halts Rollout of Xeomin for Ten Months
By John Marsh on
Allergan, Inc. v. Merz Pharmaceuticals: Central District of California Hammers Merz for Failure to Timely Produce Documents and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Halts Rollout of Xeomin for Ten Months…
Continue Reading Allergan, Inc. v. Merz Pharmaceuticals: Central District of California Hammers Merz for Failure to Timely Produce Documents and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Halts Rollout of Xeomin for Ten Months
Thursday Wrap-Up (Jan. 26, 2012): Noteworthy Stories on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes and Cybersecurity on the Web
By John Marsh on
Posted in China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, General, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Non-Solicitation Agreements, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets
Thursday Wrap-Up (Jan. 26, 2012): Noteworthy Stories on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes and Cybersecurity on the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (Jan. 26, 2012): Noteworthy Stories on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes and Cybersecurity on the Web
Amylin v. Eli Lilly: Raising the Bar to Proving Irreparable Injury in the Trade Secret Case?
A recent federal case in California illustrates the challenges of proving irreparable injury in a trade secret dispute…
Continue Reading Amylin v. Eli Lilly: Raising the Bar to Proving Irreparable Injury in the Trade Secret Case?
LinkedIn and Litigation: Social Media Continues to Transform Trade Secret Law
LinkedIn and Litigation: Social Media Continues to Transform Trade Secret Law…
Continue Reading LinkedIn and Litigation: Social Media Continues to Transform Trade Secret Law