Trade Secrets

State Ex Rel. Luken v. Corp. for Findlay Market of Cincinnati: The Ohio Supreme Court Finds Rental Information Qualifies as a Trade Secret

By John Marsh on April 29, 2013

State Ex Rel. Luken v. Corp. for Findlay Market of Cincinnati: The Ohio Supreme Court Finds Rental Information Qualifies as a Trade Secret…
Continue Reading State Ex Rel. Luken v. Corp. for Findlay Market of Cincinnati: The Ohio Supreme Court Finds Rental Information Qualifies as a Trade Secret

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 25, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on April 25, 2013

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Solicitation Agreements, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 25, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (April 25, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Meet Me in Seattle for the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s Spring Meeting, May 1-3, 2013

By John Marsh on April 24, 2013

Posted in Trade Secrets

Meet Me in Seattle for the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s Spring Meeting, May 1-3, 2013…
Continue Reading Meet Me in Seattle for the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s Spring Meeting, May 1-3, 2013

The Trade Secret Litigator Goes To Washington: My Response to the Federal Register’s Request for Public Comments for Laws Regarding Trade Secret Enforcement

By John Marsh on April 21, 2013

Posted in Economic Espionage Act, International, Legislation, Trade Secrets

The Trade Secret Litigator Goes To Washington: My Response to the Federal Register’s Request for Public Comments for Laws Regarding Trade Secret Enforcement…
Continue Reading The Trade Secret Litigator Goes To Washington: My Response to the Federal Register’s Request for Public Comments for Laws Regarding Trade Secret Enforcement

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 18, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on April 18, 2013

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Solicitation Agreements, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 18, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (April 18, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

FirstEnergy Solutions v. Flerick: Solicitation of Former Clients Results in Enforcement of Non-Compete in Six States

By John Marsh on April 17, 2013

Posted in Injunctions, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

FirstEnergy Solutions v. Flerick: Solicitation of Former Clients Results in Enforcement of Non-Compete in Six States…
Continue Reading FirstEnergy Solutions v. Flerick: Solicitation of Former Clients Results in Enforcement of Non-Compete in Six States

Episode 6 of the Fairly Competing Podcast: Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief

By John Marsh on April 15, 2013

Posted in Injunctions, Non-Compete Enforceability, Podcast Episodes, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Episode 6 of the Fairly Competing Podcast: Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief…
Continue Reading Episode 6 of the Fairly Competing Podcast: Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 11, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on April 11, 2013

Posted in China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Florida, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (April 11, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (April 11, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Cease and Desist Letters: Defamation May Not Be An Issue But Watch Out for Tortious Interference

By John Marsh on April 6, 2013

Posted in Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Cease and Desist Letters: Defamation May Not Be An Issue But Watch Out for Tortious Interference…
Continue Reading Cease and Desist Letters: Defamation May Not Be An Issue But Watch Out for Tortious Interference

Friday Wrap-Up (April 5, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on April 5, 2013

Posted in China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, International, Mattel v. MGA, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Non-Solicitation Agreements, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Friday Wrap-Up (April 5, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (April 5, 2013): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Menu

The Trade Secret Litigator