John Marsh

Contact:

Meet Me in Toledo for “The Addictive Nature of IP Issues” – March 7, 2012, Toledo Intellectual Property Law Association

By John Marsh on March 2, 2012

Meet Me in Toledo for “The Addictive Nature of IP Issues” – March 7, 2012, Toledo Intellectual Property Law Association…
Continue Reading Meet Me in Toledo for “The Addictive Nature of IP Issues” – March 7, 2012, Toledo Intellectual Property Law Association

Thursday Wrap-Up (March 1, 2012): Noteworthy News on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes and Cybersecurity Stories on the Web

By John Marsh on March 1, 2012

Posted in California, Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Intellectual Property, International, Licensing, Mattel v. MGA, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets, Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)

Thursday Wrap-Up (March 1, 2012): Noteworthy News on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes and Cybersecurity Stories on the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (March 1, 2012): Noteworthy News on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes and Cybersecurity Stories on the Web

General Patent Corp. v. Wi-LAN: To What Extent Can In-House Counsel Be Restrained from Working for Competitors?

By John Marsh on February 28, 2012

Posted in General, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Technology Transactions, Trade Secrets

General Patent Corp. v. Wi-LAN, Inc.: To What Extent Can In-House Counsel Be Restrained from Working for Competitors?
Continue Reading General Patent Corp. v. Wi-LAN: To What Extent Can In-House Counsel Be Restrained from Working for Competitors?

Thursday Wrap-Up (February 23, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web

By John Marsh on February 23, 2012

Posted in California, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, DuPont v. Kolon, Economic Espionage Act, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (February 23, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (February 23, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Stories from the Web

Four Reasons Why The Trade Secret Community Should Rally Around The Kohl/Coons Amendment to the Economic Espionage Act

By John Marsh on February 20, 2012

Posted in International, Legislation, Trade Secrets

Four Reasons Why The Trade Secret Community Should Rally Around The Kohl/Coons Amendment to the Economic Espionage Act…
Continue Reading Four Reasons Why The Trade Secret Community Should Rally Around The Kohl/Coons Amendment to the Economic Espionage Act

Promoting a Culture of Security: Is It the Most Important Step in Protecting Trade Secrets?

By John Marsh on February 17, 2012

Posted in Cybersecurity, General, Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets

Promoting a Culture of Security: Is It the Most Important Step in Protecting Trade Secrets?
Continue Reading Promoting a Culture of Security: Is It the Most Important Step in Protecting Trade Secrets?

Thursday Wrap Up (Feb. 16, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Articles from the Web

By John Marsh on February 16, 2012

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Illinois, Intellectual Property, International, International Trade Commission, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap Up (Feb. 16, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Articles from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap Up (Feb. 16, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity Articles from the Web

Avoiding Disputes Over IP Ownership: Two Recent Cases Reinforce the Importance of Agreements with Researchers and Engineers

By John Marsh on February 14, 2012

Posted in China, Economic Espionage Act, Illinois, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Licensing, Patents, Pennsylvania, Technology Transactions, Trade Secrets

Avoiding Disputes Over IP Ownership: The Importance of Agreements with Researchers and Technicians…
Continue Reading Avoiding Disputes Over IP Ownership: Two Recent Cases Reinforce the Importance of Agreements with Researchers and Engineers

U.S. v. Liew: Feds Expand Indictment to Include Chinese State-Owned Pangang Group

By John Marsh on February 10, 2012

Posted in California, China, Economic Espionage Act, Intellectual Property, International, Trade Secrets

U.S. v. Liew: Feds Expand Indictment to Include Chinese State-Owned Pangang Group…
Continue Reading U.S. v. Liew: Feds Expand Indictment to Include Chinese State-Owned Pangang Group

Menu

The Trade Secret Litigator