Legislation

Thursday Wrap-Up (December 20, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on December 20, 2012

Posted in Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Texas, Trade Secrets

Thursday Wrap-Up (December 20, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Thursday Wrap-Up (December 20, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Friday Wrap-Up (December 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on December 7, 2012

Posted in China, Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, New York, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Friday Wrap-Up (December 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (December 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Another Big Year in Trade Secret and Non-Compete Law: A Recap of Major Decisions, Legislation and Trends in Ohio and Nationally in 2012

By John Marsh on December 1, 2012

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Injunctions, Intellectual Property, IP Litigation, Legislation, Non-Compete Enforceability, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Another Big Year in Trade Secret and Non-Compete Law: A Recap of Major Decisions, Legislation and Trends in Ohio and Nationally in 2012…
Continue Reading Another Big Year in Trade Secret and Non-Compete Law: A Recap of Major Decisions, Legislation and Trends in Ohio and Nationally in 2012

Friday Wrap-Up (November 30, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on November 30, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Florida, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets

Here are the noteworthy trade secret, non-compete and cybersecurity stories from the past week, as well one or two that I missed over the past couple of weeks: Noteworthy Trade Secret and Non-Compete Posts and Cases:

A California federal jury has ordered Best Buy Co. Inc. to pay $22 million for unjust enrichment after finding

…

Economic Espionage Act Update: U.S. Senate Passes Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act in Response to U.S. v. Aleynikov

By John Marsh on November 29, 2012

Posted in Economic Espionage Act, Legislation, Trade Secrets

Economic Espionage Act Update: U.S. Senate Passes Trade Secret Clarification Act in Response to U.S. v. Aleynikov…
Continue Reading Economic Espionage Act Update: U.S. Senate Passes Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act in Response to U.S. v. Aleynikov

Wednesday Wrap-Up (November 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on November 7, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Patents, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Wednesday Wrap-Up (November 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Wednesday Wrap-Up (November 7, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Why Are Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements More Important Than Ever? (Hint: A Little Something Called The America Invents Acts)

By John Marsh on October 27, 2012

Posted in Intellectual Property, Legislation, Non-Disclosure Agreements, Patents, Trade Secrets

Why Are Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements More Important Than Ever? (Hint: A Little Something Called The America Invents Acts)…
Continue Reading Why Are Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements More Important Than Ever? (Hint: A Little Something Called The America Invents Acts)

Friday Wrap-Up (October 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non- Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

By John Marsh on October 12, 2012

Posted in California, China, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Cybersecurity, Economic Espionage Act, Injunctions, Intellectual Property, International, IP Litigation, Legislation, Monthly Wrap-Up Posts, Non-Compete Enforceability, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Restrictive Covenants, Social Media, Trade Secrets

Friday Wrap-Up (October 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non-Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web…
Continue Reading Friday Wrap-Up (October 12, 2012): Noteworthy Trade Secret, Non- Compete and Cybersecurity News from the Web

Read My Hips: Is the Trade Secret Litigator Waffling on a Key Provision of the Protecting American Trade Secrets and Innovation Act of 2012?

By John Marsh on September 23, 2012

Posted in Economic Espionage Act, Intellectual Property, International, Legislation, Trade Secrets

In July, Senators Herb Kohl (WI), Chris Coons (DE) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) introduced the Protecting American Trade Secrets and Innovation Act of 2012 (PATSIA), to the applause of many in the trade secret community, including yours truly. One of PATSIA’s notable provisions proposed is an ex parte seizure order that would enable a trade …

Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!

By John Marsh on September 14, 2012

Posted in Intellectual Property, Legislation, Patents, Trade Secrets

Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!
Continue Reading Does the America Invents Act Provide Trade Secret Owners with a Mulligan for Patent Protection? The Legislative History of the Revised §102(a)(1) Says “Absolutely”!

Menu

The Trade Secret Litigator